FMI Releases Q2-2013 Construction Outlook Report

 FMI, a provider of management consulting and investment banking to the engineering and construction industry, released Q2 2013 Construction Outlook. The strength of individual markets is shifting, reducing annual Construction-Put-In-Place predictions to $913 billion, a 7% growth from 2012. 

This is down nearly $6 billion from the $918,897 million, 8% growth estimated in the Q1’s Outlook. However, FMI does expect growth to return to 8% growth in 2014, with annual CPIP reaching $989 billion.
 

The major markets adjusted downward with lower expected growth are:

Residential Construction (-1.8%) — FMI continues to forecast a 23% increase in construction put in place for single-family housing. However, multifamily housing has dropped from a strong increase of 42% in 2012 to a current 31% increase for 2013.

Commercial Construction (-0.8%) — The current forecast calls for about a 1% drop in commercial construction from the Q1 forecast. However, this still represents a modest increase of 6%, to $49.8 billion for 2013. One of the contributing factors is that sales for retail and food service businesses is slower than initially anticipated.

Healthcare (-3.15%) — Contributing factors for the decrease include hospital beds per 1,000 people trending downward and shorter patient stays.

Amusement and Recreation (-2.0%) — Given the belt-tightening attitude across the country right now, it will likely be much more difficult to get funding from taxes and municipalities to build new stadiums in the near future.

Sewage and Water Disposal (-3.8%) — Construction for sewage and waste disposal was off 2% in 2012. FMI forecasts another 2% drop in 2013. The ability to fund necessary water infrastructure improvements is central to the decline as many municipal water systems still depend on the tax base for funding.

Water Supply (-3.2%) — Construction for water supply projects will drop 1% in 2013 after dropping 7% in 2012. On the bright side, in March the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee unanimously approved a Water Resources Development Act, including a measure to create the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. WIFIA would provide $50 million per year from 2014 to 2018 to help fund large-scale water infrastructure projects.

While there is no singular reason for the drop in these markets — each is evaluated on its own criteria — there are a few economic concerns that touch all of them.

• The decline in public construction
• Expectations of more cuts as the sequestration continues
• Tight lending criteria
• Consumers cautious about increasing their debt load.

This economic climate will keep the heat on A/E/C industry competition, especially if companies that make their livelihood in government construction start looking for work in the already competitive private sectors.

The report details CPIP in three residential building, 11 nonresidential building and five non-building structure categories. To download a copy of the full report, click here. For reprint permission or to schedule an interview with the author, please contact Sarah Avallone at 919.785.9221 or savallone@fminet.com.

Project Disruptions Impacting Construction Industry

FMI, a provider of management consulting and investment banking to the engineering and construction industry, released its annual CURT Owners Survey. The report is based on surveying 45 member of the Construction Users Roundtable (CURT). CURT provides a national and international forum for the exchange of information, views, practices and policies of construction users from an array of industries and represents nearly $200 billion in capital and maintenance spending power. 

The 2012 survey reports that project disruptions, in the form of delays, cancellations and funding challenges, are having a significant impact on owners' capital programs with 83 percent reporting project delays, 41 percent reporting project cancelations and 93 percent reporting the need to use self-funding for projects.
 

How capital program owners respond to both the current and future environment will significantly influence their ability to effectively plan, design, procure and manage capital projects. Based on survey responses, many capital-program owners have already begun the process of identifying future challenges and mitigating the impact. However, more than half are not confident in their responses to date.

The survey addresses:

• Identifying future issues that may impact capital programs and the degree of preparedness to address those issues
• The level of staffing changes during the past four years and anticipated staffing trends going forward
• The degree of project disruptions affecting capital programs
• The continued evolution of project delivery systems and procurement methods

Traditional design/bid/build re­mains the most commonly selected delivery method. However, as project size increases, the use of other project delivery methods increases significantly.

To download a copy of the full report, click here. For reprint permission or to schedule an interview with the author, please contact Sarah Vizard Avallone at 919.785.9221.